Archive for March, 2009

Mar 25 2009

Morrison v. Morrison – Undue influence and revocation

A son, the named executor of his father’s will, filed the will for probate. Two other sons filed a caveat (objection) raising claims of undue influence and revocation. The caveators’ undue influence claim was based on the role the executor played in selecting the attorney who drafted his father’s 1998 will and his alleged participation…

Mar 25 2009

Smith v. Wyatt – Presumption of the probate court’s correctness in the absence of a hearing transcript

The decedent’s sister filed a caveat (objection to a will) alleging that the decedent lacked testamentary capacity and had been unduly influenced by the person named as executor in the decedent’s will. The caveat also claimed that the person named as sole heir in the will was neither the natural nor adopted child of the…

Mar 23 2009

Baker v. Merrill Lynch Trust Co. – Charitable bequest and the “cy pres” doctrine

A testator (person who executes a will) left the bulk of her estate to a trust. Under the terms of the trust, some assets were to be distributed to named heirs with most of the remainder of her estate to go to a foundation. However, the testator died before she actually established the foundation. Merrill…

Mar 23 2009

Booker v. Booker – Right to appeal probate court decision

After a man died intestate (without a will), his widow petitioned the probate court for year’s support. The probate court granted her petition. The decedent’s mother appealed to the superior court, but the court dismissed her appeal, finding that she had no standing (right to pursue the claim in court). The Court of Appeals affirmed…

Mar 23 2009

Deering v. Keever – Amending a caveat

A petition to probate a will listed a woman and her brother as the decedent’s heirs, though they were not named as beneficiaries in his will. Acting pro se (without an attorney), the woman filed a caveat (objection) to the petition, asserting that the will failed to identify her or other heirs as being disinherited….

Mar 19 2009

Montgomery v. Montgomery – Right to a trial by jury in appeal of year’s support award

Following her husband’s death, a widow petitioned the court for year’s support, and she was awarded a half interest in the marital home and a car. The husband’s son appealed to the superior court, which reduced the award to the car, personal property, and $14,000. The superior court also denied the widow’s demand for a…

Mar 19 2009

Anderson v. Westmorland – Year’s support award

A widow filed a petition for year’s support, and the daughter of the decedent filed an objection. The probate court granted the award and the superior court affirmed the award, but the Court of Appeals held that the widow was not entitled to year’s support. The year’s support must be reasonably related to the amount…

Mar 18 2009

Dorsey v. Kennedy – Relevant time for evidence of undue influence and lack of capacity

A man died in 2006 after a long battle with dementia. A woman attempted to probate a will the man purportedly executed on July 29, 1999. The man’s son and stepson filed caveats (objections to the will). A jury found that the will was invalid because it was the product of the woman’s undue influence…

Mar 13 2009

Taylor v. Taylor – Year’s support award

When a man died intestate (without a will), his widow and surviving son entered into an agreement to divide the net estate, and they each took distributions of $30,000. The widow then filed a petition for a year’s support of $60,000 plus other assets worth $24,000. Following a hearing, the probate court awarded her a…

Mar 5 2009

Weatherly v. Weatherly – Life insurance proceeds

In 2000, a mother named her daughter as beneficiary of her life insurance policy. In 2003, she added her two sons as contingent beneficiaries, leaving her daughter as sole primary beneficiary. When the mother died after a long illness in June, 2005, her daughter sought 100% of the proceeds of her mother’s life insurance policy….